Is Secrets AI Free? What the $0 Plan Actually Gets You
Yes, there is a free tier, and it does not expire. It also has no Moments, no images, no video and no real memory. Here is exactly where the wall sits.
Candy AI's image generator lives inside chat and runs on a token meter. Here is what a picture costs, what Premium includes, and the privacy terms most buyers skip.
Candy AI sells pictures, not conversation. Text chat is unlimited on Premium; every image prompt spends tokens. That single sentence explains most of the complaints you will find about the app, and most of the bills too.
We rate Candy.ai 9.8 out of 10. It earns that score on the pictures themselves: realistic or anime, generated inside the chat, tied to a character you built. It loses points on memory, on the token meter and on terms that let your prompts train models. If you are here because you want to know what an image actually costs before you hand over $13.99, keep reading.
Short version: images are a companion feature, not a standalone art studio. You cannot buy a picture pack and walk away. You buy a subscription, you get a token allowance, and the pictures come out of that allowance one prompt at a time.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What you get | Companion images generated inside chat |
| Access | Premium; a new account gets one image to try |
| Cost per photo | About 4 tokens in recent reports; older reports say about 2 |
| Tokens included | Premium 100/month; Premium Plus 330/month |
| Style | Realistic or anime |
| Image to video | About 12 tokens per clip (reported) |
| Privacy catch | De-identified prompts and outputs may train models |
One caveat on the per-image number: it is reported, not published. Candy does not put a clean price list in front of you. The rate you get is the rate you see inside your account, and it has moved between 2 and 4 tokens across reports.
The generator is bolted onto the chat window. You are talking to a character, you ask for a picture, the picture appears in the thread. That is the whole product loop, and it is why the images feel more personal than a Midjourney render: the face stays attached to a personality you set up.
The Create My AI builder handles the setup. You pick the look, the personality, the voice, the hobbies. From there, the character can send selfies, and one comparison site claims custom selfies land in under five seconds. Treat that as a vendor-adjacent claim rather than a guarantee; generation speed depends on load.
Two styles, no more: realistic or anime. There is no painterly mode, no sketch mode, no style slider. If you want range, this is not the tool. If you want one consistent character who looks like a person and texts like one, it works.
Video is the newer layer. There is no text-to-video: you start from an image or a supported character, and a clip costs about 12 tokens, roughly three images. Live Action video only runs on selected characters, so do not assume your custom build gets it.
Every prompt costs, including the bad ones. A few habits cut the waste:
Memory is the weak link here. Candy claims memory retention; testers report storylines resetting after 48 to 72 hours. If your character forgets the jacket, the prompt has to carry that detail again. Premium Plus adds 20 memory slots and user personas, which helps but does not fix the underlying reset problem. Our full Candy.ai review goes deeper on that.
The sticker price is genuinely low. The token meter is where the money goes.
| Item | Price or tokens | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Premium monthly | $13.99 | Reviewers |
| Premium quarterly | $8.99/month ($26.97) | Reviewers |
| Premium yearly | $3.99/month ($47.88) | Reviewers |
| Included tokens | 100/month; Premium Plus 330 | Candy AI |
| One image | About 4 tokens (older reports: about 2) | Reported |
| Image to video | About 12 tokens | Reported |
| New custom character | 10 tokens | Reported |
| Extra token packs | $9.99 (100 tokens) to $299.99 (3,750 tokens) | Third-party listings; prices sit behind login |
Run the numbers on the monthly plan. At 4 tokens per image, 100 tokens buy about 25 pictures a month. At the older 2-token rate, about 50. That is the real ceiling, and it is not generous.
Top-ups are worse. At the $9.99 pack rate, an image lands around $0.40 at 4 tokens, or $0.20 at 2. Compare that to the subscription: the yearly plan at $3.99/month buys you 100 tokens for less than a single top-up pack. If you are going to pay, pay annually and stay inside the allowance.
Heavy media users report spending $25 to $80 a month once video enters the picture. One clip costs about three images, and a ten-clip session eats a third of your monthly Premium tokens. Budget accordingly, or skip video.
Less than the marketing implies. A new account gets one image to try. The free tier is one image, one custom character and five messages total. Explicit images need Premium, so most adults will hit the wall inside ten minutes.
That is not unusual for the category, but it means you cannot judge image quality honestly before paying. One trial image tells you the style. It does not tell you how the generator handles a crowded prompt or a second character in frame.
None of these are hidden exactly. They are just not on the pricing page.
Search results citing Candy's image page claim over 100 characters. We could not verify that figure. Characters are not the bottleneck anyway; tokens are.
This is the section most buyers skip and the one that should decide the purchase.
Candy runs TLS encryption but makes no end-to-end encryption claim. That means the platform can read your messages. De-identified prompts and outputs may be used to train AI and moderation models, and human reviewers may see flagged content. Outside model providers and hosting vendors may receive message content. Account data may be retained up to three years of inactivity.
Then there is the license. Terms section 4 grants EverAI a perpetual worldwide license to your content, while Candy says it makes no ownership claim. Legal teams can hold both of those sentences at once. You should read them as a pair rather than trusting the friendlier one.
GDPR applies because the company is in Malta. Deletion runs through Settings, then the Danger Zone, then an email to support to request erasure. Do both steps. If privacy is your main concern, our comparison of Secrets AI vs Candy AI is the honest read: Secrets AI 9.9 treats privacy as the product, Candy treats pictures as the product.
The age gate is 18+, and some regions add age estimation or ID checks. Explicit media is only for fictional adults. Minors are banned outright, an automated filter screens for it, and CSAM is reported to NCMEC.
The rule with real legal teeth is newer. Since May 2025, the US Take It Down Act criminalizes nonconsensual intimate AI deepfakes. Generating an explicit image of a real person without consent is not a terms violation; it is a federal crime. Candy's filters may catch it, and you should not be relying on them. Keep every character fictional and every face invented.
Candy's yearly price is the lowest of the three we compared. Its per-image allowance is also the tightest.
| Companion | Annual price | Credits | Cost per image |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candy.ai | $3.99/month | 100 tokens | About 4 tokens (reported) |
| OurDream AI | $9.99/month | 1,000 dreamcoins | 5 dreamcoins per in-chat image |
| Secrets AI | $9.17/month | 8,000 Moments | 50 Moments (100 at 2K) |
Do the math and the trade-off is obvious. OurDream AI 9.7 charges five dreamcoins per in-chat image against 1,000 monthly, which works out to roughly 200 images a month. That is eight times Candy's 25. Free OurDream users cannot make pictures at all, and media is blurred once a plan ends, so it is not a free lunch either. Our Candy AI vs OurDream AI breakdown covers the rest.
Secrets AI charges 50 Moments per image, or 100 at 2K, against 8,000 monthly. The catch: no Moments on the basic tier, and monthly grants do not roll over. Our Candy AI alternatives page sorts the field by which complaint you are trying to fix.
So: Candy wins on price and on the pictures themselves, if the realistic look is what you want. It loses on volume, on memory and on privacy terms. OurDream is the volume play. Secrets is the memory-and-privacy play.
If you searched for candy art generators, you are in the wrong place. Candy art sites have nothing to do with Candy.ai. People designing candy imagery use Midjourney or DALL-E. Candy AI's generator makes companion photos, not product art, and the two search intents should not be mixed.
The best reason to use Candy AI is realistic, consistent character visuals with chat and video attached. Treat it as a paid companion feature, not a standalone image generator, and the pricing makes sense.
Budget about 25 images a month at the 4-token rate. Pay yearly if you are paying at all, because the annual plan beats a top-up pack on price. Skip video unless you have tokens to burn. Read the privacy terms before your first prompt, because your prompts may end up training a model.
And keep every character a fictional adult. That part is not negotiable.
No. A new account gets one image to try, and explicit images require Premium. Text chat is unlimited on paid plans, but every image prompt spends tokens.
Recent reports put it at about 4 tokens per image, with older reports saying about 2. Candy does not publish a fixed rate, so check the price shown inside your account before you commit.
We found no confirmed photo upload or image editing tool. Even if one appears, never upload a real person's photo, since nonconsensual intimate AI deepfakes have been a federal crime in the US since May 2025.
Yes, starting from an image or a supported character, at about 12 tokens per clip. There is no text-to-video, and Live Action video only works on selected characters.
Not fully. De-identified prompts and outputs may be used to train AI and moderation models, human reviewers may see flagged content, and outside model providers may receive message content. There is no end-to-end encryption claim.
Three platforms, ranked on what they actually deliver: memory that holds, voices that sound human, and prices you can check before signing up. Nobody paid for a spot on this list.